-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cleanup feature code after mainnet-beta activation #34289
cleanup feature code after mainnet-beta activation #34289
Conversation
c59f118
to
b7a6668
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #34289 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 81.9% 81.9% -0.1%
=========================================
Files 819 819
Lines 219884 219759 -125
=========================================
- Hits 180263 180122 -141
- Misses 39621 39637 +16 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few initial comments, but as you mentioned this will not be merged until future version.
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ type MicroLamports = u128; | |||
|
|||
pub enum PrioritizationFeeType { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we plan to introduce more variants of prioritization in the near future?
If not, imo we should just get rid of this enum entirely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, I agree. Didn't want to do it in "feature cleanup" PR. Would like to do it when this pr is merged. Given it's take some time before landing the cleanup PR, dont know what's the best way to remind myself to refactor tho 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe just an issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Problem
feature
EfhYd3SafzGT472tYQDUc4dPd2xdEfKs5fwkowUgVt4W
Remove support for RequestUnitsDeprecated instruction #27500 activated everywhere.Summary of Changes
Fixes #